STENO SCHOOL
STENO & TYPING CLASSES
Call us: +91 8591090661
Please Wait a Moment
Menu
Dashboard
Register Now
Join Us
Delhi District Court Matter (Type at 45 wpm) (English)
Font Size
+
-
Reset
Backspace:
0
Timer :
00:00
Vide order No. 887/37133168/Bail Power/Gaz/2021 dated 01.07.2021 issued by Ld. Principal District & Sessions Judge (HQs), Delhi, the undersigned has been authorized to dispose of bail/urgent criminal applications pertaining to the PS Pratap Nagar (Gulabi Bagh), Civil Lines, Roop Nagar, Timarpur, Burari, Subzi Mandi, Bara Hindu Rao, Maurice Nagar, Crime Branch of Central Police District and Wazirabad. Vide this order, this Court shall adjudicate upon the anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of the accused. Arguments were heard in extenso, the gist whereof is discussed hereunder. Vide this order, this Court shall adjudicate upon the anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of the accused. Arguments were heard in extenso, the gist whereof is discussed hereunder. Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused submitted that applicant is not the husband of the complainant and that the marriage of the husband and complainant was love cum arrange marriage, therefore, question of dowry did not arise. It was submitted that the husband and the complainant left the home of the fatherinlaw in April, 2016 after altercation between the fatherinlaw and husband of the complainant. They left the home of the fatherinlaw after two days of altercation with their goods and belongings. It was further submitted that parents of the husband have debarred/disowned the husband from all movable and immovable properties vide issuance of public notice which was published in Hindi daily newspaper Virat Vaibhav dated 12.03.2019. It has also been pointed out that son of the complainant and the husband is undergoing regular treatment and attending speech therapy. Complainant left the home of the father-in-law in April, 2016 after altercation between the father-in-law and husband of the complainant. They left the home of the father-in-law after two days of altercation with their goods and belongings. It was further submitted that parents of the husband have de-barred/disowned the husband from all movable and immovable properties vide issuance of public notice which was published in Hindi daily newspaper Virat Vaibhav dated 12.03.2019. It has also been pointed out that son of the complainant and the husband is under going regular treatment and attending speech therapy. Per contra, Ld. Addl. PP for the State along with IO vehemently opposed the present anticipatory bail application as per law. Submission heard and record perused. Reply of the IO reveals that applicant has been joining investigation and cooperating with the investigation. Thus, this Court does not deem it fit to allow apprehension of the applicant by the police at this juncture, so long as the applicant cooperates and joins the investigation as and when called for. Needless to say, the abovementioned observations are predicated solely on the facts as alleged, and brought forth at this juncture, and are not findings on merits, and would also have no bearing on the merits of the case. With these conditions, and observations, the anticipatory bail application stands disposed off.
Vide order No. 887/37133168/Bail Power/Gaz/2021 dated 01.07.2021 issued by Ld. Principal District & Sessions Judge (HQs), Delhi, the undersigned has been authorized to dispose of bail/urgent criminal applications pertaining to the PS Pratap Nagar (Gulabi Bagh), Civil Lines, Roop Nagar, Timarpur, Burari, Subzi Mandi, Bara Hindu Rao, Maurice Nagar, Crime Branch of Central Police District and Wazirabad. Vide this order, this Court shall adjudicate upon the anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of the accused. Arguments were heard in extenso, the gist whereof is discussed hereunder. Vide this order, this Court shall adjudicate upon the anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of the accused. Arguments were heard in extenso, the gist whereof is discussed hereunder. Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused submitted that applicant is not the husband of the complainant and that the marriage of the husband and complainant was love cum arrange marriage, therefore, question of dowry did not arise. It was submitted that the husband and the complainant left the home of the fatherinlaw in April, 2016 after altercation between the fatherinlaw and husband of the complainant. They left the home of the fatherinlaw after two days of altercation with their goods and belongings. It was further submitted that parents of the husband have debarred/disowned the husband from all movable and immovable properties vide issuance of public notice which was published in Hindi daily newspaper Virat Vaibhav dated 12.03.2019. It has also been pointed out that son of the complainant and the husband is undergoing regular treatment and attending speech therapy. Complainant left the home of the father-in-law in April, 2016 after altercation between the father-in-law and husband of the complainant. They left the home of the father-in-law after two days of altercation with their goods and belongings. It was further submitted that parents of the husband have de-barred/disowned the husband from all movable and immovable properties vide issuance of public notice which was published in Hindi daily newspaper Virat Vaibhav dated 12.03.2019. It has also been pointed out that son of the complainant and the husband is under going regular treatment and attending speech therapy. Per contra, Ld. Addl. PP for the State along with IO vehemently opposed the present anticipatory bail application as per law. Submission heard and record perused. Reply of the IO reveals that applicant has been joining investigation and cooperating with the investigation. Thus, this Court does not deem it fit to allow apprehension of the applicant by the police at this juncture, so long as the applicant cooperates and joins the investigation as and when called for. Needless to say, the abovementioned observations are predicated solely on the facts as alleged, and brought forth at this juncture, and are not findings on merits, and would also have no bearing on the merits of the case. With these conditions, and observations, the anticipatory bail application stands disposed off.
Submit
Submit Test !
×
Dow you want to submit your test now ?
Submit